A longitudinal behavioral study released Tuesday found that repeat infidelity shows a statistically significant correlation with incremental improvements in bedroom performance, a pattern researchers say appears driven by what the report describes as “high-frequency experiential optimization across multiple partners.”
You are not going to be the guy with the bunker. Here is the next best thing: Stuff to Buy Before Everything Goes to Shit
The paper, published in the Journal of Applied Relational Efficiency, tracked 2,418 self-identified repeat cheaters over a five-year period using anonymous performance surveys, partner satisfaction indexes, and a standardized metric known as the Interpersonal Endurance and Coordination Scale (IECS). Participants reporting three or more affairs showed a 27% improvement in reported stamina and technique scores compared with individuals who remained monogamous throughout the study period.
Researchers attributed the gains primarily to repetition and diversified feedback loops. According to the report, subjects engaged in infidelity were exposed to “an expanded range of expectations, complaints, and comparative benchmarks,” accelerating what the study calls “skill acquisition through relational turnover.”
Administrative appendices include 19 separate performance categories, ranging from rhythm consistency to “situational adaptability under time constraints.” One dataset shows repeat offenders improving an average of 0.6 IECS points after each additional affair, plateauing after the sixth.
Today's questionable purchase recommendation: the "If It Fries, It Fries" tee.
Academic Community Introduces “Applied Adultery Performance Curve”
Dr. Nathaniel Kline, Senior Fellow at the Midwestern Institute for Behavioral Throughput Analysis, defended the findings during a press briefing.
“The performance gains are unsurprising. If someone treats romantic betrayal as a training regimen, they will inevitably accumulate experience. The body does not recognize the moral framework in which repetition occurs.”
The study’s methodology relied heavily on post-encounter survey instruments distributed through encrypted relationship-tracking apps. Researchers reported a 92% honesty rate among respondents, citing the fact that “participants were already comfortable lying in other contexts.”
Institutional review boards approved the study under the classification Human Behavioral Observation, Category 7: Ongoing Poor Decisions. The research team also introduced a provisional metric called the “Adultery Learning Curve,” charting improvement against the number of partners betrayed.
Researchers emphasized the study does not endorse infidelity but simply documents its measurable outcomes within a performance framework.
Funding for the project came from a private foundation whose donor list is sealed until at least three divorces are finalized.