In a discovery that has upended long-held assumptions about the purpose of physical media, a coalition of academic historians announced this week that books may have once been used for activities beyond killing spiders.
You are not going to be the guy with the bunker. Here is the next best thing: Stuff to Buy Before Everything Goes to Shit
The report, published in the Journal of Misremembered Literacy, suggests that prior to the advent of streaming platforms and touchscreens, printed books were “regularly opened, read, and even enjoyed,” often without a single arachnid in sight.
“We now believe books served as vessels for stories, knowledge, and sometimes even emotional resonance,” said Dr. Erin Maltz of the National Historical Learning Initiative. “Though we cannot say definitively what people were trying to accomplish, the evidence suggests they weren’t just smacking pests.”
Researchers cited multiple pieces of circumstantial evidence, including:
Currently accepting payment in cash, credit, and questionable life choices for the "My Conspiracy Theory Is Better Than Yours" tee.
- Marginalia written in pen, rather than squashed legs
- Library checkout slips indicating sequential use
- A 1974 Reader’s Digest with peanut butter smudges on page 86 but no visible impact crater
The revelation has shocked many in Gen Z and late-stage millennials, who largely associate books with furniture staging, ironic gifts, and “emergency spider protocol.”
“Wait, people used to sit down and read those?” asked 29-year-old media strategist Kyle Jasper, who keeps a stack of novels near his bed “in case something fast and hairy shows up.”
Retailers have responded quickly to the news. Amazon announced a limited-edition Kindle “Spider Mode,” which features a digital bookmark shaped like a boot, while Pottery Barn is reportedly phasing out decorative book sets in favor of heavier, insect-killing volumes labeled THWACK.
At press time, historians confirmed that old libraries may have once been public gathering places, though researchers warned that theory remains “speculative and kind of sad.”